Bombay High Court Protects Arijit Singh’s Personality Rights in Landmark Ruling
In a landmark decision, the Bombay High Court has safeguarded the personality rights of celebrated singer Arijit Singh by issuing a restraining order against platforms that utilize Artificial Intelligence (AI) to mimic his voice. This ruling highlights the increasing vulnerability of celebrities to unauthorized AI-generated content and reaffirms the importance of protecting an individual's persona in the digital age.
 |
| "Arijit Singh’s" |
The Case
Justice Riyaz Chagla's ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by Singh, represented by advocate Hiren Kamod. Singh's petition challenged AI platforms that employed technology to replicate his voice and other personality traits without permission. The singer identified eight such platforms, alleging they used AI to create unauthorized content that imitated his voice, name, singing style, and image.
Court’s Observations
Justice Chagla expressed significant concern about the misuse of AI technologies, which allow for the unauthorized generation of content mimicking celebrities. He emphasized that while freedom of speech and expression are fundamental rights, they do not extend to the exploitation of a celebrity's persona for commercial gain. The court highlighted the potential harm caused by such technologies, which enable unauthorized appropriation and manipulation of a celebrity's identity.
The judge underscored that celebrities have the right to control and protect their likeness, voice, and other personal attributes from commercial exploitation by third parties. The court's decision reflected an understanding of how generative AI tools can undermine a celebrity’s ability to maintain control over their public image and prevent deceptive uses of their identity.
Implications for AI Platforms
The court's order mandates the removal or deletion of all posts, content, and voice conversion tools related to Singh's personality rights. This move serves as a cautionary note to AI platforms, emphasizing the need for compliance with legal standards and the protection of individual rights. The ruling clarifies that making AI tools available for unauthorized voice conversion constitutes a violation of personality rights, further establishing legal boundaries for the use of such technologies.
Singh's Perspective
Advocate Kamod noted that Singh, who has consciously avoided commercial endorsements and the commercialization of his personality traits, sought this legal action to protect his personal and professional integrity. The lawsuit reflects Singh’s commitment to maintaining the authenticity of his public persona and preventing unauthorized exploitation of his identity.
The Bombay High Court’s decision is a significant step in addressing the challenges posed by advanced AI technologies in the realm of personal rights. It reinforces the notion that technological advancements should not come at the expense of individual rights and privacy. As AI continues to evolve, this ruling sets a precedent for how the law might navigate the intersection of technology and personal rights, ensuring that celebrities and public figures can safeguard their identities from unauthorized use.
